<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Octopus Strategies &#187; branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insights.octopusstrategies.com/tag/branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insights.octopusstrategies.com</link>
	<description>branding. but bigger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brand &amp; Reputation Management</title>
		<link>http://insights.octopusstrategies.com/2010/04/brand-reputation-management/</link>
		<comments>http://insights.octopusstrategies.com/2010/04/brand-reputation-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowlands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldman sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.octopusstrategies.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Who&#8217;s responsible for your company&#8217;s reputation?&#8221; This is the question posed in the title of a Harvard Business Review article published April 28 and written by Ron Ashkenas, author of The Boundaryless Organization. His answer, which draws on the current case against Goldman Sachs, and the ongoing trials and tribulations of Toyota&#8217;s quality control progams, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who&#8217;s responsible for your company&#8217;s reputation?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the question posed in the title of a Harvard Business Review <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/ashkenas/2010/04/whos-responsible-for-your-comp.html" target="_blank">article</a> published April 28 and written by Ron Ashkenas, author of The Boundaryless Organization. His answer, which draws on the current case against Goldman Sachs, and the ongoing trials and tribulations of Toyota&#8217;s quality control progams, among others, posits that reputation management &#8220;may need to be part of everyone&#8217;s responsibility.&#8221;</p>
<p>When any stakeholder—customer, employee, investor, etc.—chooses to buy from, work with or invest in any organization, their decision is based at least in part on the organization&#8217;s reputation. Based on the historical performance and customer care of an organization like Disney (another of Ashkenas&#8217;s examples), we expect a certain experience: For customers, that&#8217;s fabulous, family-friendly entertainment; for employees, its an amazing, innovative work environment; for investors, it&#8217;s a healthy, reliable return on their investment in the form of regular dividends.</p>
<p>Organizations that don&#8217;t hold to their own standards of responsibility inevitably erode their own reputations: Toyota&#8217;s current experience, for example, implies a betrayal of their legendary quality control practices. They&#8217;re fortunate to have such a strong reputation, forged through decades of strict adherence to their core values; they&#8217;ll likely weather the current storm. However, their customers won&#8217;t be fooled again. Repeated errors and quality gaffes will erode Toyota&#8217;s reputation, sales, and market share.</p>
<p>Reputation management—and brand management—require the care and attention of leaders, managers, and everyone else in an organization. A strong brand requires a remarkable degree of <a href="http://insights.octopusstrategies.com/2010/02/howard-schultz-talk-about-love/" target="_blank">personal responsibility</a>. How successful and consistent is your brand at enhancing its reputation?</p>
<p>This <em>expectation of an experience</em> is precisely our definition of the word brand.</p>
<p>Organizations can choose to embed responsibility for this expectation in their operations and standards, or they can choose to let it follow the whim of circumstance. In Disney&#8217;s case, leadership and management &#8220;make every employee feel responsible for the entertainment products and services they provide.&#8221; Johnson &amp; Johnson, legendary for their adherence to their &#8216;credo,&#8217; emphasizes every employee&#8217;s &#8220;responsibility to put the well-being of the people they serve first.&#8221; These are two of the most reputable firms in the world. And they&#8217;re also two of the most valuable brands in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insights.octopusstrategies.com/2010/04/brand-reputation-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

